Search This Blog

Sunday 18 September 2011

Top 50 Female Names by the century pre-conquest to 1600

Top Female Names by the century pre-conquest to 1600 
This research came from a mix of the Suffolk Domesday Book, the Paston letters, the Boldon Book and the Oxford Dictionary of Surnames, [on the principle that a name needed to be fairly common to become a surname; and examples of the original first name and the source are cited within it].  I do not claim 100% accuracy but it should give a fair idea.
I shall give the top 50 names of each period. I’ll give the most common variants.  Where a shared place low down the table carries the numbers over 50 so be it.
In the earliest period  stretching beyond 20 names is difficult, this does not mean that these were the only names used, merely that I have not got evidence of others.  Generally speaking those Saxon/Viking names from 1067-1199 would probably also have been in use. 
Bear in mind that in early times there were a number of variants on names and that the use name might not be much like the name in the parish register. Also the changing of pronunciation with the Normans and in different parts of the country caused name changes. See ‘The Mutability of Names with regard to pronunciation’

Pre
conquest
1067-
1199
1200-
1299
1300-
1399
1400-
1499
1500-
1535
1536-
1600

Wulfhild
Alice
Alice
Alice
Agnes
Jane
Margaret
Elizabeth

Sigrith
Mathilda
Mathilda
Agnes
Alice
Jane

Alfleta
Alviva
Bricteva
Ediva
Edith
Emeline
Godusa
Mawa
Agnes
Agnes
Mathilda
Joan/Jane
Alice
Ann etc

Edith
Emma
Amice
Isabel
Isabel
Elizabeth
Marjorie
Agnes
Alice

Julian
Margaret
Margaret

Amice
Lettice
Mary
Emma
Marjorie
Joan
Catherine
Agnes
Ellen

Margaret
Elizabeth
Ann etc
Margaret
Mary

Christina
Amice
Ann etc
Marjorie
Catherine

Richenda
Hilda
Genevieve
Marjorie
Julian
Emma
Ellen
Catherine

Mary
Sibilla
Isabel
Marjorie

Aldreda
Angrebod
Earngith
Godiva
Golde
Gudrun
Gunnilda
Gunnora
Ingrid
Leofe
Livitha
Loveday
Milda
Mildred
Mildburgh
Saelova
Seberga
Torilda
Werthiva
Whyburgh
Ysopa

Isabel
Christiana
Beatrix
Ellen
Mathilde
Mary
Frances

Cecilia
Goditha
Iva/Ivette
Isabel
Joy
Odelina
Stanilde
Cecily
Elena
Dorothy
Frances
Margaret
Cecily

Edith
Cecily
Isabel

Joan
Dyonisia
Amice
Christiana
Cecily
Dyonisia
Eve etc
Mary
Rose etc
Sarra
Dorothy

Elena
Edith
Cassandra
Cecily
Crystobell
Emma
Euphemia
Godlefe
Griselda
Julian etc
Nicola
Rose
Scientia
Thomasine
Mathilda
Susan[nah]

Avice
Petronille
Sibilla
Catherine

Beatrice
Thomazin
Grace
Barbara

Sarra

Basilia
Bettrys
Bothild
Clarissa
Engelise
Helewis
Iseult
Julian
Love
Magisend
Muriel
Pavia
Rimilde
Sarra
Sabine
Sephare
Sybil
Wakerilda
Ismenia
Mary
Sibilla

Bettrys
Christina
Emma
Hannah
Joyce[lin]
Martha
Petronelle
Rosamund
Sarah

Lettice
Eve
Lettice
Lucy

Eve

Gunnora
Catherine
Felicia

Petronella
Rose
Emma
Frances
Isolde
Jenefer
Joyce[lin]
Lettice
Nicola
Olivia
Tiffany
Thomasin
Truda
Wenthelen
Wilamin

Lucy
Millicent
Rose
Avice
Agatha
Isolde
Hawisia
Elisabeth
Tiffany




Ingaret
Beatrix
Blanche
Bridget
Clementia
Audrey
Jenefer
Kynburgh
Patience
Philippa
Protasia

Albreda
Isolde
Ida
Idonea
Hawisia
Sabine
Sarra







Ann etc
Clarissa
Enota
Felicia
Goditha
Idonea
Ismenia
Nota












Acelina
Adeline
Basilia
Godith
Grace
Helewis
Iva/Ivette
Olivia
Orabella
Pavia




Ailith
Acelina
Aliva
Barbara
Christina
Cwenhild
Ediva
Egidia/Gilot
Eve
Fleur
Golde
Ismay
Leofe
Lina
Lucy
Petronille
Saegifu
Stanburgh
Tiecia
Theda
Turgiva
Tovilda
Werthiva
Whyburgh














Albreda
Alviva
Constance
Helewis
Lavinia
Laura
Leveda Masota
Olivia
Scholastica Thomasin






























Bricteva
Eulalia
Hilda
Laura
Love
Lovechild
Muriel
Pleasance
Preciosa
Ragenhild
Regina
Sedehana
Scholastica
Susan

























49 comments:

  1. I really like this! Just what I needed to answer a question. I am not understanding the significance of the blocks? Some with one name, some with a list? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, Anonymous! where there is more than one name, it means those names appeared with equal regularity in the sample I took. For instance in 1300-1399 Joan and Marjorie were equal 6th, which means the next name, Amice, was 8th. I've often ended up with a tail of names that take the top 20 to more than 20 because I couldn't separate them. Be aware that the names here also show the most popular form, and encompass the pet names as well. Joan was the most common form of what later became almost exclusively Jane; one might have found Jean,Jehanne, Joanne, Johanna, Jennet etc

    ReplyDelete
  3. What I find interesting is many names from previous eras have made it to our day, while others have sort of disappeared. There are names that were so common in that era that I have never heard. Very interesting !!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi, Lilac! yes, it's interesting which ones have staying power, and that we are familiar with names like Matilda and Hilda which are close on 2000 years old even though they aren't exactly up in the popularity stakes... and then of course there were fads, even then, like the Diamanda/Argentina type ones, even as today there's a fad for calling girls after places, like Erin, Shannon, Brooklyn, Kimberley, Chelsea and probably sooner or later Battersea or possibly with the celebrity habit of the place of conception, Thebackofdadscortina or Cortina for short.
    Of course with the Medieval habit of giving pet names, sometimes one of many pet names or forms has been revived or continued. We don't use Amice, but may still find Amy and Amanda; equally Helewis lurks now in Louise. The move from Bettrys to Beatrice as the most common form may be noted on the table. It should also be noted that most people whose names have been recorded in early documents were the upper class; and I strongly suspect that many of the peasantry were still using Saxon names almost through to Tudor times.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for gathering and making this list available.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Can anyone tell me more about Masota?

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Masota is probably a diminutive as -ot was a diminutive and often with a girl [though not always] was -ota. I left it in because I was unable to trace back a clear etymological path. It MAY be a variant of Mazelina which can be [1] a female version of the diminutive Mazelin for the Norman given name Mazo or [2] a diminutive for Mathilda [Oxford Dic. of Surnames: surname, Maslin]. Considering the number of ways Machtilde [the original form] was mangled up to and including Maud, it wouldn't surprise me. But I decided to play safe... if it was a form of Mathilda, it might have swapped the placings of Mathilda and Agnes in second and third, but there weren't enough Masotas to make a significant statistical difference

    ReplyDelete
  9. Basilia and Pavia...gorgeous! I wish I was having another daughter! But alas, I'm having a son. So is there a post for boy names?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yup, here's the top 50 names from each century from the conquest to 1600: http://sarahs-history-place.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/top-50-male-names-by-century-pre.html
    and literary names from the Arthurian cycle etc: http://sarahs-history-place.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/medieval%20names
    the hypochoristics of names [table of male names at end]: http://sarahs-history-place.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/medieval-nicknames-pet-names-and-use.html
    And some of the more unusual names used by officers in the Peninsular War: http://sarahs-history-place.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/regency-names-male-used-by-officers-at.html
    So, when you hear of someone named Lancelin Artleberte Geryon Ebenezer you can blame me...

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is useful for a children's story I'm writing. It gives me somewhere to select names for my characters. It's funny how so many of these names have survived - names we often think of as quite modern. Thank you. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  12. that's splendid! it really is a tool intended for authors, so I'm glad it's useful. Let me know how it goes! and yes, there are some very surprising ones in there. Some of them passed out of use and were revived latterly of course.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wow, who knew there were Tiffanys and Jennifers even way back then! Thank u for producing such a comprehensive list. Even by researchingjust a few names, I'm already learning so much history ��

    ReplyDelete
  14. Glad you enjoyed, you sound like me, someone who looks up something particular and gets distracted by other things... a historian's equivalent of a kitten and "Ooo butterflies!".... Theophania is an awful name to inflict on a little girl, I'm glad it became Tiffany very quickly! Jenefer was the oldest form of Jennifer once it moved from Guinevere and was found in Cornwall much earlier than it appeared in the rest of the country. What surprised me was that the odd Kyneburgh and Godlefa survived as late as they did.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Names of 1565 help

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thank you so much for this chart, Sarah! I'm working on a mystery in a medieval setting and this will come in very handy. I am stunned that the name Tiffany was around then. Do you know if the name Mercia was in use after the conquest? I like it for one of my characters, but I'm working in the 1300s and figured it was probably out of use by then.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Kimberly, I'm so glad it's useful! Tiffany surprised me until I discovered it's nothing more than a mangling of Theofania, or Theophania, a saint-name. Scientia/Sanchia/Sensey was the one that surprised me! No, I don't have all the variants on this post I'm afraid, I think I did post a list of pet names and variants though. If not I'll rectify that.
    I am wary of Mercia, I think your instincts are right. To me, it's more a place name ... and Mercy won't be fashionable for another 350 years as a virtue name. Odd Saxon and Viking names endured, Thorfinn and Torkil and similar could be found on the east coast up to the 18th century and Torkil endured longer in Scotland as Torquil. I've come across the odd Angrebod and Godiva and Saelova up to the 16th century and Loveday and Lovechild survived even longer, especially Loveday. After about 1380 they tended to be more female than male names, in the same way that in more recent times Jocelyn has become purely female, and Lesley for a girl is often spelled in the boy fashion Leslie, which has disappeared as a male name. Kimberley has been stolen by females as has Shirley, which is Anne Bronte's fault, though men have stolen Morgan.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hi Sarah,

    I was delighted to find my granddaugjter's name, Isolde, on your lists from 1200 to 1499. I love the name and wonder if Isolde has historical significance?

    Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  19. Isolde is the accepted English form of Yseult or Essylt, from Arthurian legend, the tragedy of Drustan [Tristan] and Yseult [Isolde]. It's a Welsh/Breton name. Iselda was a form also used in the Middle Ages. As with many names from the Arthurian cycle, it had a revived popularity after the publication of Morte d'Arthur in 1585, though it had dropped in popularity to the 'also rans' outside the top 50. The probable popularity of it in the early years of the 15th century would be an interest in Arthurian stories with rising literacy of the artisan class, which also led to Lollardy, following the writing of the [possibly satirically intended] Sir Gawaine and the Green Knight in the late 14th century.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I am so pleased to have found your blog! My family in 1600 had some very odd names. I understand they were written in Latin and all that it entails but names like Kellamus, Fortuna, Appelina, Jocosa do seem a little fanciful! Do you think they might have a modern equivalent? Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thanks I needed to make up a colonist and I did not no any names from the 1600's.

    ReplyDelete
  22. there's a few more here http://sarahs-history-place.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/what-i-am-up-to-and-civil-war-plot.html

    ReplyDelete
  23. incidentally of the link I just posted, some of the boys with outlandish surnames for names were colonists!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Great Post!
    But I'm missing the name Eleanor. Clearly there were a few from 1100-1300 with that name.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes, it's odd that I didn't turn it up in the common folk [relatively speaking] that I went through. You'd think a queenly name would be more common.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I love the name Sybil, I'm using it for a story! thanks for the info!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Excellent, feel free to drop a link when it's published! the same to anyone who uses information from my blog

    ReplyDelete
  28. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  29. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hi
    My first time on your blog and i love it.
    Please visit my blog baby blog thanks

    ReplyDelete
  31. I am trying to write a story with three girls born in the late 1600s whose parents are explorers. Is there any names that are more unusual for them?

    ReplyDelete
  32. certainly but to some extent it depends on whether their families are Parliamentarian in tradition or Royalist. Generally those of Parliamentarian bent would be more likely to use a name like Hezekiah, Hebshebeth, Bythia, Prudence, Patience, Mercy, Faith, Dorcas; and those of Royalist bent more likely to use Henrietta, Fri[d]swith, Maria[h], Ursula. However there are politically neutral unusual names like Sibella, Rose, Blanch, Winifred, Margery, Priscilla, Dorothea, Christabella.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I'm actually hunting Scandinavian names from pre 1600+/-. Some say Viking names but I've researched enough to know that it was all Scandinavia and only those that went to sea and conquered other countries were Vikings the rest were ordinary Scandinavian people. Love finding things like this with the names and it is interesting how modern names can be traced back in time. Well most of the time excepting the ones named Blue or Grass or something odd. Like you mentioned Cortina or say Ford. I don't think anyone named their kid Chevrolet, but I wouldn't put it past them. lol. Thanks Sarah for all the cool info.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are welcome. If you are still short of Viking names, email me on sjwaldock@yahoo.co.uk - I'd direct you to my book of names from pre-Roman Europe to 1600 but I am still collating the last part of it to get it ready for publication

      Delete
  34. Do you have a record of where you found Saelova? I'm trying to find documentation for that name and I'm coming up totally blank >_<

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. crumbs! ok, the 3 likely sources are [unlikely as it may sound] the Oxford dictionary of surnames, which cites patronymics and matronymics and also the first names and dates of the names thereof; The Boldon Book, a slim volume about the estates of that name; and the Suffolk Domesday book.
      Got it! p397 of the paperback under Sealeaf [surname] giving the original as Saelufu, Salove, Seluue. The form Saelova probably came from a random other mention in the book of a female with another surname, it was the usual way it changed in medieval records even as -gifu became -[g]iva. I hope that helps!

      Delete
  35. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Is there a reason Alice stayed so popular?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it seems to have caught the imagination when it was brought by the Normans. It derives from Adalheid, so is one of the names starting noble- which tended to be popular with the Saxon population used to naming in two-part names chosen for meaning.

      Delete
  37. Also, what is the orgin of the name Lettice?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lettice is from Laeticia, a virtue name directly from the latin meaning 'happy'.

      Delete
    2. Welcome! Lettice lasted better than the briefly used Lalage, meaning laughter. I've occasionally threatened to write about twins, Lalage who is a pessimist, and Niobe who is cheerful and outgoing.

      Delete
  38. Thank you Sarah! Just starting research for my new book and some of these names will be really good for the characters 🙂

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're welcome! Good luck with the new book and feel free to advertise it here - which goes for anyone who has used my research - when it's written and published.

      Delete
  39. Hello Sarah I have been tracing my family tree for many years and I have been really taken by a first name that I have not been able to find anywhere, the name appears in the parish register for Biggleswade in Bedfordshire the name is Found or Founde and later Founday, have you heard of this name before?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. never! how fascinating. are parents given? I am speculating that the child is a foundling perhaps? of course the other possibility if a boy is that it is the maiden name of the mother, something more common amongst the gentry, but if there was a wealthier family member on the mother's side, not impossible to curry favour. As a surname, Founder is the common form for one who casts metal. Now if a foundling, if early, -day was often added to Love to make Loveday, found as a male name sometimes as well as female, though not as common, as well as Lovechild [Leofcild] a bastard, so if it's early, it might well be a child who was a foundling, adopted into a childless family. But that would be probably before 1400. Later, I would suspect surname influence. Sorry I can't be more help but I hope I can give you something to look into.

      Delete
  40. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete